NOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 14.9% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 4.72%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.79% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,076.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.1%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. ServiceNow's net income of $460M is higher than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.86x while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 18.88x versus 0.84x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 14.9% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 15.63%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.79% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,076.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. ServiceNow's net income of $460M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.86x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 76.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 18.88x versus 8.49x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 14.9% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of -9.59%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.79% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,076.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.05 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.678%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. ServiceNow's net income of $460M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.86x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 18.88x versus 4.33x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 14.9% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of -5.04%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.79% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,076.21, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 54.55%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. ServiceNow's net income of $460M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.86x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 18.88x versus 0.28x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.